OHANA - an interferometric Network at Mauna Kea Telescopes
A joint informal meeting was held on March 16/17th 2000 in Waimea between
the following participants:
-
Fred Chaffee (Keck)
-
Phil Crane (NASA)
-
Catherine Dougados (CFHT)
-
Greg Fahlman (CFHT
-
Olivier Guyon (IfA)
-
Olivier Lai (CFHT)
-
Pierre Lena (DESPA)
-
Guy Perrin (DESPA)
-
Steve Ridgway (NOAO)
-
Francois Rigaut (GEMINI)
-
Claude Roddier (IfA)
-
Francois Roddier (IfA)
-
Christian Veillet (CFHT)
-
Peter Wizinowich (Keck)
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the concept of OHANA (Optical
Hawaiian Array for Nanoradian Astronomy), proposed in 1996 by Mariotti
et al. (A&ASS, 116, 381-393. SPIE 3350, 785-792.) for the coherent
coupling of existing large telescopes on the Mauna Kea site by means of
optical fibers. The attendees look forward to expanding participation in
OHANA discussions, including other potential partners from the site.
1. Overview
The site with its telescopes, as it is right now, has a unique interferometric
potential, that is only achievable with optical fibers. The long baselines
and the large apertures extend the scientific capability of existing ground
interferometers (VLTI, KI) and complement future space missions (TPF, Darwin/IRSI).
Such an implementation will contribute to longer term issues regarding
the role of hectometric or kilometric arrays of large telescopes.
A cooperative program between institutes and telescopes represented
on the summit of Mauna Kea generated enthusiasm amongst the participants
of the meeting. A step by step approach was considered including:
-
Simple demonstration of feasability,
-
Highly focused science with pairs of telescopes,
-
Long term evolution towards an imaging array.
2. Rationale
Two technological breakthroughs in the last years make this project
entirely feasible:
-
Large telescopes can now be equipped with adaptive optics, providing
Strehl ratios at least 0.3 at 2 microns on faint sources (R<14~15).
-
Coherent light transport and coupling with single mode fibers in K
and L bands is routinely demonstrated with the IOTA/FLUOR interferometer,
leading to scientific results with unprecedented quality of visibilities
(0.3% stability)
There is no other site on earth which provides the combination of superb
seeing, largest collecting areas with AO, near kilometric baselines and
easy potential cooperation between partners. The severe competition for
observing time must be weighted against the scientific capabilities offered
by these factors.
The resolution at 2 microns of an 800 meter baseline such as that
defined by Keck and CFHT or Gemini is 0.5 milliarcseconds. Conservative
estimates of the limiting magnitudes for visibility determination (see
below) lead to a value of K=12 in snapshot observing.
With these values, a highly focused science program can soon be
directed towards AGNs and ULIRGs. 0.2~0.5 milli-arcsecond resolution at
K gives access to their very inner part, otherwise inaccessible. Even a
few accurate visibility values departing from unity would significantly
constrain models. Spectral resolution is not initially required. With the
limiting magnitudes, tens of objects are readily accessible. In many cases,
a significant fraction of the flux comes from the core as demonstrated
with AO at the 100 mas. These data will extend by a factor of 9 in resolution
the KI and VLTI results.
A longer term development would give access to fainter galactic
and extragalactic sources and considerably extend the scientific capabilities
in terms of sensitivity, u-v plane coverage and imaging potential.
3. Instrument overview & sub-systems
The initial instrument concept is based on the following:
3.1 AO operation of each telescope,
-
This is standard operation with no special requirement
3.2 beam extraction from each focal plane with a single mode fiber,
-
Due to the AO capability of beam steering, a simple optical module
ensures the feeding into the fiber
3.3 beam transport through the fiber from each telescope to a recombination
laboratory,
-
This step can be split in two: a) from telescope to its base, where
routing must account for bending and twisting (possible polarization impact).
b) From telescope base to laboratory through existing underground ducts
with no site impact whatsoever.
3.4 controlled optical delay,
-
Long delays are necessary (up to 300 meters or more). Delays are achieved
with slew-and-clamp and continuous lines properly folded to reduce volume
and to be compatible with existing space in the telescopes. Vacuum and/or
air operation can be implemented in successive project phases. Use of single
mode components requires small size optics in the line (5~10cm).
3.5 beam recombination and signal detection,
-
This subsystem is entirely identical to the IOTA/FLUOR recombiner,
as fiber transport erases memory of the telescope size. A proven solution
is therefore readily available. A classical high sensitivity array detector
is needed with only a few pixels being used.
3.6 instrument control.
Thanks to fibers, each item is a self-contained independent package.
Connectivity between fibers with small losses (a few percent) ensures modularity.
Items 3.2 and 3.3 are specific to the project and require prototyping and/or
testing. Item 3.2 has already successfully been tested on a large telescope
(ESO 3.6 meter). Item 3.3 raises the issue of polarization and this has
already been addressed and solved in FLUOR (or polarization maintaining
fibers could be considered if necessary). Item 3.4 is based on well established
principles. Item 3.5 and 3.6 are standard.
Item 3.2 can be subject to further development to accomodate dual
beam extraction (already planned for Keck and VLTI without fibers).
4. Plan
The plan is organized in three phases.
Phase I. The objective is to demonstrate 3.2 and 3.3.a, and to elaborate
a funding plan for phase II. Phase I includes:
-
the construction of a prototype beam extractor and its test on the
sky to measure injection efficiency and stability with AO.
-
The evaluation and measurement of routing, bending and twisting impacts
on fiber behaviour for the various telescope configurations (Cassegrain,
equatorial and alt-az, and Nasmyth on alt-az).
-
Design of phase II: science programs, detailed instrumental plan and
costing.
Phase II. aims at interferometric operation between pairs of telescopes
and highly focused science on specific targets, proving the astronomical
value of the whole project.
Possible choices for telescope pairs are: a) K1 and K2; b) K1 or
K2 and IRTF or Subaru; c) CFHT and Gemini. a) is readily available but
combines interferometry designed telescopes, b) involves more partners,
c) combines non-interferometric telescopes and therefore models the project
goals. East-West and North-South baselines provide specific pros and cons.
Phase II includes:
-
Fiber layout from telescope to laboratory with suitable protection
(about 300 meter fibers).
-
Construction of delay lines, possibly of a simple type and limited
range to begin with.
-
Installation of beam combination, detection and control.
-
Test on the sky, validation of performances and demonstration of significant
science on a few objects.
Phase III. aims at full exploitation and pending on previous results,
cooperation prospects and funding capabilities, may include:
-
more telescope pairs,
-
extension toward shorter wavelengths,
-
fringe tracking,
-
dual beam extraction and faint objects science,
-
imaging capability.
5. Implementation of Phase I
A student from the Ecole doctorale of Paris (Graduate school in astronomy)
will most likely be selected to get started for his PhD with Phase I, beginning
by a short (ca. 2 months) visit to Hawaii starting around end August (tbd).
Costs of the visit will be shared between Meudon (travel) and local institutions
(local expenses). This visit will allow familiarization with the AO systems
and the local partners, and conceptual design of the extractor.
Meudon will most likely be able to fund the construction of the
extraction set-up and to provide short (ca. 2m) fibers for it. Local partners
will handle the interfaces of the extractor with the telescopes focal planes.
The procurement and possibly cost of fibers for the routing tests (ca.
50 m) will be evaluated.
It appears essential to involve the fiber company (located in Brittany
and sole possible provider) through a visit of its Director, Mr G. Mazé,
to the site. This will be proposed to him and rediscussed for costs sharing
Further steps of phase I will be discussed at the end of this first round,
to be completed by end 2000 for the initial study.
A joint supervision of the PhD thesis between Meudon and some local
partner may seriously be considered.
6. Management
The OHANA committee is hereby created. The committee's objective is
to coordinate and organize its member institutions in the planning and
operations of OHANA until a more formal project structure is in place.
The OHANA committee will also communicate plans and activities to the astronomy
community, and serve as a contact point for potential additional partners
who may wish to participate in OHANA.
The initial institutional participation in the OHANA committee consists
of:
-
Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Corportation
-
Department Spatial, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon
-
Gemini Observatory
-
Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii
-
W.M. Keck Observatoty
-
National Optical Astronomy Observatories
The initial committee memebers are:
-
Olivier Lai, chairman (CFHT)
-
Peter Wizinowich (Keck)
-
Steve Ridgway (NOAO)
-
Francois Rigaut (Gemini)
-
Pierre Lena, Guy Perrin (DESPA)
-
Francois Roddier (IfA)
The OHANA committee contact for information is:
Olivier Lai,
CFHT, P.O. Box 1597,
Kamuela, HI 96743, USA.
tel (808) 885 7944
fax (808) 885 7288
email: lai@cfht.hawaii.edu
Additional participating Mauna Kea observatories are anticipated
and welcome.
7. Funding
The OHANA committee believes that the initial membership will successfully
obtain funding for phase I, described above.
A P.I.-Co.I structure will be established to develop the detailed
concept and budget, to seek funding and to carry out phase II.
Back to Main page
Page mainained by Olivier Lai
Last
modified: Mon Apr 17 15:09:14 HST