This paper presents a subset of first light images obtained with KIR,
the new 1024
1024 high-spatial resolution near-infrared camera
used with the adaptive optics bonnette of the CFHT.
He 2-10 is the prototype for Wolf-Rayet galaxies. Whether the
starburst activity in this object is stochastic (self-induced) in nature
or due to a merger event is very uncertain. Optical images show two
distinct centers of activity (A: the nucleus and B,
8 east
of A) reminiscent of an on-going merger event but the smooth elliptical
envelope surrounding both regions has also been taken as evidence that
He 2-10 is a single dwarf elliptical experiencing stochastic star
formation.
![]() |
Figure 1 shows a K-band image of He 2-10 obtained with KIR. The near-infrared morphology of region B is more reminiscent of a tidal tail than a small companion. There is also a feature north-west of the nucleus which looks very much like a faint tidal tail. The overall K-band morphology is similar (on smaller scale) to the famous ``Antennae''. This, combined with the smooth and faint elliptical envelope detected on the K image suggest that He 2-10 is probably a merger (in a well advanced state) of two gas-rich dwarf ellipticals.
The HST UV image of He 2-10 (Conti & Vacca, 1994) shows
a cluster of strong UV knots in the nucleus with luminosities
consistent with young (1 to 10 Myrs) globular clusters of masses between
105 and 106
. The authors argued that these globulars
could have been formed as a result of a merger event. The K-band
morphology of He 2-10 certainly strengthen this scenario.
The unsharp-masked K image (low-frequency component subtracted) of the
central 5of He 2-10 is shown in Figure 2, reveiling a clumpy
structure similar to the HST image. Thanks to the relatively large field
of view of KIR, it was possible to get an accurate registration of both
KIR and HST images. The result is shown in Figure 2. While the UV
sources are close to K sources, the overall spatial correlation is not
very good. This is especially true for two K sources (one to the NW
and the other to the SE) that have no UV counterpart nearby. These two
sources are extremely red in J-H and H-K suggesting that they are
significantly affected by extinction. Furthermore, they are very close
to 10
m sources (Sauvage et al., 1997). This
association suggests that these sources are sites of vigorous star
formation activity still embedded in dust and thus undetectable in the
UV.
![]() |
Yet extinction cannot explain everything. The JHK colors in the vicinity of the UV cluster suggest that this region is suffering from relatively low and uniform extinction. A more likely explanation for the poor spatial correlation between the UV and K sources in this region is that the latter are sampling relatively evolved (>10 Myrs) and short-lived starburst regions. These K sources were probably very strong in the UV a few Myrs ago before the OB stars turned into red supergiants. Conversely, the current UV cluster will probably disappear in the UV in a few Myrs when the OB stars become red supergiants.
It is interesting to estimate the luminosities of the K sources in the
vicinity of the UV cluster. For instance, the brightest source has an
absolute K magnitude of -14.8 (distance of 9 Mpc assumed for
He 2-10). From comparison with starburst models we can infer that such a
cluster would have a mass between 105 and 106
depending
on the age. This is the same masss range inferred for the UV sources.
Both UV and infrared observations suggest that there are relatively
young and massive star clusters in the central region of He 2-10. It is
attractive to argue that these clusters are proto-globular clusters
formed as a result of a merger event. Are there older globular clusters
in He 2-10? There are certainly candidates. The K image in Figure 1
shows three sources east of the nucleus with
=-11.7
corresponding, at the distance of He 2-10, to the peak of the galactic
globular clusters luminosity function.