Re: not_new -> replace

From: Yannick Mellier <mellier_at_iap.fr>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 08:25:35 +0200

    Dear JJ

    Are weight maps transferred ? I see one Terapix node busy since
last Friday, only for the transfer, I am wondering whether something
goes wrong.

     Best

Yannick

JJ Kavelaars wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> If you have placed all the weight into the new/replace
> directory then there are 2136 are still to be transferred.
>
> you can see this by looking in the directory
>
> /data/clix/fc6/cadc/proc/
>
> which reveals the various states of processing a files are in.
>
> JJ
>
> On 2-May-07, at 4:44 PM, Frederic Magnard wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi JJ,
>>
>> On Tue, 1 May 2007, JJ Kavelaars wrote:
>>> I noticed that the 'new' area was empty on clix and we have a number
>>> of files
>>> that were put into 'new' that were actually replacements. I've mv'd the
>>> 'not_new' files into 'replace' so they can be checked against our
>>> copies and
>>> then transfered over.
>>
>> OK, strange as I did check that the files put in the new directory where
>> not _at_cadc.
>>
>>> Are we getting close to the end of 'weight' transfers?
>>
>> I don't know, I have put all weight images to transfer in the new
>> directory, following your directions. I can see a lot of activity on clix
>> caused by your e-transfer, but I have no way to know which point in the
>> transfer it's at. I hoped you could tell us.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Fred.
>>
>>
>
Received on Thu May 03 2007 - 20:25:44 HST