Re: Test of T0004 transfer

From: JJ Kavelaars <jjk_at_hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:50:25 -0700

Having 1 .reg file per field is good, I will adjust the dataset
completeness rules.

In future releases , perhaps the .reg file should not have an
'filter' name [although it is build off the i-band image]?

JJ



On 17-May-07, at 10:03 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:

>
> Dear JJ
>
> No, we have one .reg file per field. In fact I already produced
> the 199 masks for all Deep D1/2/3/4 and Wide W1/2/3/4, even for the
> fields that have not been observed yet.
> There is this naming convention we agreed on at the beginning when
> I did each masks after we got the i-band image only. I keep the
> naming rule, CFHTLS_*_i_*.reg but the mask is valid for all filters.
>
> Yannick
>
> JJ Kavelaars wrote:
>> On 26-Apr-07, at 10:36 AM, Frederic Magnard wrote:
>>> CFHTLS_W_i_023319-070000_T0004.reg ds9 region file
>> Is there a plan to have .reg files coming with every filter/
>> catalog combination? The test batch that was sent 2 weeks ago
>> only has a .reg file 1 of the filters [i-band, see entry above].
>> I'm currently flagging stacks that DON'T have a .reg flag as
>> 'partially incomplete'.
>> Also... please start sending the stacks ASAP. Just put them in
>> the e-transfer area and we will start pulling them over. The
>> transfer will take a few days and we will not manage to achieve
>> your stated May 20 goal at this point since the transfer of files
>> will take too long.
>> JJ
>
>
Received on Thu May 17 2007 - 07:50:57 HST