Hi Fred, I checked this AM and the _u_ file has been transfered and
is now in the archive.
The CADC logs all transfer attempts and there was no previous attempt
to transfer that file. Any suggestions for why the file was missed
originally?
There may be others that we are missing, since this is just the one
that Herve noticed was missing.
CADC archive now has 18 _u_ CFHTLS_W_T0004 catalogs [from 21 transfer
attempts] can you check that this is the number of files you expect.
Here is the current contents of the archive [for Wide]
Number of Stacks / Number of catalogs
Survey, u, g, r, i, z g/r/i
WIDE-1 19/18 54/44 71/42 44/43 20/20 44
WIDE-2 0/0 20/20 39/20 33/20 01/01 20
WIDE-3 16/05 59/15 63/15 59/14 25/08 56
WIDE-4 00/00 00/00 00/00 00/00 00/00
I expected [because there are g/r/i stacks of a pointing] there
should be a chi2 catalog for that pointing?
I attached here a list of fields where we have g/r/i stacks in the
archive for T0004 but no catalog for a particular
filter. The columns are
Field Name u_catalog, g_catalog, r_catalog, i_catalog, u_catalog
if the catalog column contains an NULL then we don't have that
catalog in the archive? We also have no event log
indicating past failure or success of transfer for those files?
Based on this I get that we are missing a large number of catalogs.
Please (re)send all the catalogs and our matching
system will determine which are new and get those into the CADC
archive. Have look at the list of missing files and
let me know what you think might have happened.
JJ
On 23-Jun-07, at 8:00 AM, Frederic Magnard wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, JJ Kavelaars wrote:
>> for 021410-050800 we have no u-band catalog as yet, but there is u-
>> band image.
>>
>> Yannick: Why is there no u-band .cat file? For u-band we have
>> only 17
>> catalogs, all from Wide-1
>
> I have re-put it in the "new" directory of e-transfer area.
>
> D3-85 is now transfering, and an update of Auto_* tables is in
> /data/clix/fc6/cadc:
> Auto_status-07_06_23.csv.gz Auto_file-07_06_23.csv.gz
>
> I could only change Auto_status (to conform to D-[28]5 names), as the
> release version number is not in Auto_file. I guess the ImgId field
> is the
> key to use (same key in both tables).
>
> Cheers,
> Fred.
>
>
Received on Mon Jun 25 2007 - 09:49:16 HST