On 7-Apr-08, at 6:41 PM, kanoa wrote:
> Sifting through the 1,700 or so files in the list JJ sent, 112 are
> LS files (including L99) that do not have a detrended counterpart at
> the CADC where there should be. The rest are not supposed to have
> counterparts for a number of reasons.
Thanks Kanoa for your thorough search for missing files. My query was
very 'brain dead' one of... do we have a raw file, no elixir file and
does the runid have and 'l' in it. Naturally that hits quite a few
files that are not part of the CFHTLS collection.
I'm really glad we're down to just 2 missing files. Perhaps they
should be runid as 'engineering' data if the 'rastering' was set wrong?
JJ
Received on Mon Apr 07 2008 - 16:16:57 HST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Jul 27 2017 - 17:52:27 HST