Dear JJ, dear John
We would like to check if all data are at CADC abd retrievable, but we have this messsage
"A maximum of 2000 records were retrieved. Any remaining rows were ignored."
There are 855x2 Wide stacks + 171 chi2 images + 48 Deep stacks, + .. all catalogues, so
we exceed,. Is is possible to change the 2000 limits?
Cheers
yannick
JJ Kavelaars wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> The list of images currently available for retrieval by users is at this
> URL:
>
> <http://www.cadc.hia.nrc.gc.ca/cadcbin/cfht/archive/wdbi.cgi/cfht/tpx_stack_groups/query?release=0006>
>
>
> The MD5 checksum is shown there once we have computed it. The MD5 sum
> is computed after the data have been archived (we use a different,
> proprietary checksum for archive verification) and so some of the files
> don't yet have checksums.
>
> A link to this URL from a release page will be made once all the data
> have been transferred here (tomorrow?).
>
> In the above URL changing to release=0005 or 0004 or 0003 works (0002
> and 0001 are in a different system and not available through those forms).
>
> Cheers,
> JJ
>
>
>
>
>
> On 14-Sep-09, at 5:00 PM, Frederic Magnard wrote:
>
>> Hi John and Kanoa,
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, John Ouellette wrote:
>>> Hi Kanoa -- going through the files that have been rejected due to
>>> fitsverify
>>> errors, it looks like the errors are rather benign: they seem to be
>>> failing
>>> due to a problem with the AUTHOR keyword.
>>>
>>> I'm loathe to just turn off the fits verification, and would rather
>>> that we
>>> determine why some files have the above errors and others do not. I'm
>>> not sure
>>> whether we can choose to ignore certain FITS errors while still
>>> catching fatal
>>> errors, but I will enquire with the developers here.
>>
>> It's ok to let the fitsverify check, I manually add the missing author
>> keyword to rejected images and add them back to the new directory.
>> Thanks for the eTransfer state tool. Could you please give us the list of
>> all available interfaces/proxies we could use at cadc, for instance to
>> check that all file we've moved to eTransfer area are really transfered,
>> with the right checksum ? (and also a way to get all available archived
>> image with checksums and eventually some associated keywords)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fred.
>>
>
Received on Thu Oct 08 2009 - 06:55:58 HST