[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
Re: Some answers to Richard's comments
- To: veillet@cfht.hawaii.edu (Christian Veillet)
- Subject: Re: Some answers to Richard's comments
- From: Ray Carlberg <carlberg@qold.astro.utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:09:41 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: veillet@cfht.hawaii.edu (Christian Veillet), vigroux@discovery.saclay.cea.fr (Laurent Vigroux), Olivier.LeFevre@astrsp-mrs.fr (Olivier LeFevre), annie@obs-besancon.fr (Annie Robin), rjw@IfA.Hawaii.Edu (Richard Wainscoat), kavelaars@physics.mcmaster.ca (JJ Kavelaars), ablancha@ast.obs-mip.fr (Alain Blanchard), carlberg@moonray.astro.utoronto.ca (Ray Carlberg), David.Schade@hia.nrc.ca (David Schade)
- In-Reply-To: <3A661683.92BE1891@cfht.hawaii.edu> from "Christian Veillet" at Jan 17, 2001 12:02:43 PM
VISTA plans to use the new "deep depleted" CCDs (if it build the
optical imageer) which have very good z response. The EEV's appear to
go to zero QE at about 1micron and are inferior to what the CFH12k has
in the red bands. Between area and sensitivity with essentially equal
image quality it is a lot more capable than CFHT. Our only advantage
is that we are in the north. For anything that is hemisphere
independent the combination of VISTA and VST as two dedicated
telescopes is going to wipe out any small effort at CFHT.
However, we do have the most capable telescope for the next 5 years
which is quite a nice window. If we focus most of our time and effort
on key questions with sharply defined observations, then we can do
very well.