[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

UH or not UH...



Bonjour

At the last SAC meeting, the UH representatives made clear that UH is not likely
to participate into a CFHLS which would be significantly beyond the 42 nights.
As we are keeping a request for a lot more than these 42 nights and there are
good chances to get much more than these 42 nights (though we could get
less than the 110 nights a year we ask for), I wonder what is your feeling on 
how to handle the UH participation in our report.

There are two ways do work in the coming weeks:
1/ Start to outline everything with only C and F. 
2/ Keep in parallel a data flow, an organization and a night accounting with and
without H.

1 has the advantage of the simplicity, and the the disadvantage of assuming that
we can't change UH position on the coming months.

2 is a bit more complex, though the additional work to present alternate
solutions is not that big a deal as it doesn't change the basis of the survey.
It keeps the UH participation an open issue, which looks fair as SAC is only
an advisory committee anyway...

I favor 2 myself. I would like to get your own feeling back asap.


Thanks

Aloha

Christian