[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
calibration
- To: Christian Veillet <veillet@cfht.hawaii.edu>, David Schade <David.Schade@hia.nrc.ca>, Richard Wainscoat <rjw@IfA.Hawaii.Edu>, Christian Veillet <veillet@cfht.hawaii.edu>, Laurent Vigroux <vigroux@discovery.saclay.cea.fr>, Olivier LeFevre <Olivier.LeFevre@astrsp-mrs.fr>, Yannick Mellier <mellier@iap.fr>, Annie Robin <annie.robin@obs-besancon.fr>, JJ Kavelaars <kavelaars@physics.mcmaster.ca>, Alain Blanchard <ablancha@ast.obs-mip.fr>, Ray Carlberg <carlberg@moonray.astro.utoronto.ca>
- Subject: calibration
- From: Ray Carlberg <carlberg@astro.utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:26:08 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <3B9DBA5F.D7626A9E@cfht.hawaii.edu>
- References: <3B9DBA5F.D7626A9E@cfht.hawaii.edu>
Christian - is there an explicit calibration plan? This is easy for the ultra
deep, feasible for the wide deep, but a real issue for the very wide.
An idea is that the survey itself build an explicit calibration plan, largely
based on the 15% of clear, but poor seeing time (some fraction of that will
be photometric). Of course that time wouldn't be added to the cost of the
survey--if done efficiently it may well represent a time saving for CFHT.
An interesting technical suggestion is that the calibrations might be done
with a "window pane" which would include panels of the 5 SDSS filters.
Whether this would work depends on the projection of filter plane on to the
detector plane. That would allow each field to be calibrated in a single
exposure, instead of 5 of them. Of course we would need to zero point this
calibration to the true filters, but that is a one time only operation.
Calibration of 0.03-0.05 mag is fine for galaxies, but definitely not the
standard for stellar objects, which will be much of the interest of the
ultra-wide.
In any case, some discussion of the calibration procedures and expected
precision should be included in the plan.
--Ray