On 13-Apr-07, at 3:03 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
>
> Dear JJ
>
> We have not converged yet on the naming of the Deep-T0004 25% and
> 85%. Shall we keep T0014 and T0024 as you suggested?
I would prefer to not create additional syntactic logic for the 25/85
splits of the deep stacks.
But adding to the RELEASE value is a bit confusing:
T0014, which I suggested, seams like release 14, stead of 4, and the
'1' doesn't provide much context information
The current filename logic [as expressed in the archive] is: CFHTLS_
{SURVEY}_{FILTER}_{RA}{DEC}_{RELEASE}_{TYPE}
{TYPE} has values: .fits, weight.fits, chi2.fits, chi2_weight.fits
chi2.cat, wo.cat, wo_chi2.cat
Will there be multiple 'TYPE' files for each of the IQ selections
that go into the DEEP stacks?
{SURVEY} is currently limited to: D, W, VW, Pre-W
Perhaps we should add to the {SURVEY} set values like D-85 and D-25
which would express the concept that this is the DEEP 25% IQ and 85%
IQ stacks, then the remaining name logic can be left as is?
Thoughts?
JJ
>
> Cheers
>
> yannick
>
Received on Fri Apr 13 2007 - 07:37:17 HST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Jul 27 2017 - 17:52:27 HST