Re: CADC : release

From: Yannick Mellier <mellier_at_iap.fr>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:16:26 +0200

JJ Kavelaars wrote:
>
> On 13-Apr-07, at 3:03 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear JJ
>>
>> We have not converged yet on the naming of the Deep-T0004 25% and
>> 85%. Shall we keep T0014 and T0024 as you suggested?
>
> I would prefer to not create additional syntactic logic for the 25/85
> splits of the deep stacks.

     Dear JJ

   I am find with this rule. If everybody agree then we will name
D-25**** and D-85****

   Cheers

Yannick

>
> But adding to the RELEASE value is a bit confusing:
> T0014, which I suggested, seams like release 14, stead of 4, and the '1'
> doesn't provide much context information
>
> The current filename logic [as expressed in the archive] is:
> CFHTLS_{SURVEY}_{FILTER}_{RA}{DEC}_{RELEASE}_{TYPE}
>
> {TYPE} has values: .fits, weight.fits, chi2.fits, chi2_weight.fits
> chi2.cat, wo.cat, wo_chi2.cat
>
> Will there be multiple 'TYPE' files for each of the IQ selections that
> go into the DEEP stacks?
>
> {SURVEY} is currently limited to: D, W, VW, Pre-W
>
> Perhaps we should add to the {SURVEY} set values like D-85 and D-25
> which would express the concept that this is the DEEP 25% IQ and 85% IQ
> stacks, then the remaining name logic can be left as is?
>
> Thoughts?
> JJ
>
>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> yannick
>>
>
Received on Fri Apr 13 2007 - 08:16:33 HST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jul 27 2017 - 17:52:27 HST