Re: not_new -> replace

From: Frederic Magnard <magnard_at_iap.fr>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 01:44:49 +0200 (CEST)

Hi JJ,

On Tue, 1 May 2007, JJ Kavelaars wrote:
> I noticed that the 'new' area was empty on clix and we have a number of files
> that were put into 'new' that were actually replacements. I've mv'd the
> 'not_new' files into 'replace' so they can be checked against our copies and
> then transfered over.

OK, strange as I did check that the files put in the new directory where
not _at_cadc.

> Are we getting close to the end of 'weight' transfers?

I don't know, I have put all weight images to transfer in the new
directory, following your directions. I can see a lot of activity on clix
caused by your e-transfer, but I have no way to know which point in the
transfer it's at. I hoped you could tell us.

Cheers,
Fred.
Received on Wed May 02 2007 - 13:44:58 HST