Re: Problem in W2 T0005 filelist preparation

From: Yannick Mellier <mellier_at_iap.fr>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:01:02 +0200

        Dear JJ

     Ok, thanks. I went though this because I did compare first W4 and
there is a perfect agreement: 657 VALIDATED in the log and 657 at CADC.
So, I expected to double check this way on all fields.

     Cheers

yannick

JJ Kavelaars wrote:
>
>
> Hi Yannick,
>
>
>> Movever, I found the RA of W2 Mid-Nov 2007 run listed at CADC is wrong
>>
>> 00:22:* , instead of 08:*:**
>
>
> for reasons I don't know, many of the exposures had incorrectly
> translated 'RA' and 'DEC'. I've corrected those Wide survey images with
> incorrect RA/DEC in the db.
>
> On the 'VALIDATED' count issue. CADC receives this info from CFHT in a
> stream separate from the actual images. It appears that we have missed
> tagging many of the files with there QSO status. I've started looking
> into this problem and will attempt to get the values up-to-date within
> the next few hours.
>
>
> JJ
>
>
>
>
> On 8-Apr-08, at 2:51 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>> I checked the data that will be included in W2-T0005. W2 shuld
>> include all W2 VALIDATED images from
>>
>> 730652 | 03BQ06 Dec 24
>> to
>> 967609 | 08AQ01 Feb 13
>>
>>
>> There are 814 VALIDATED images listed in the log, excluding all Pre-W2.
>>
>> However, the CADC only lists 740 VALIDATED images, INCLUDING Pre-W2.
>> For Terapix it means we CANNOT start W2 for the moment.
>>
>> Movever, I found the RA of W2 Mid-Nov 2007 run listed at CADC is wrong
>>
>> 00:22:* , instead of 08:*:**
>>
>> that is the RA is off by 08hrs. The log indicates a correct W2 RA.
>> Herve then checked also in the PH2 and cross-checked the log:
>>
>> "I just checked the PH2 database, and I can confirm that the RA of
>> exposure 955448p is 09:05:25 and not 00:21:48. I also confirm that
>> there should be 814 exposures on W2, excluding pre-survey. So the
>> problem seems to be on the CADC db. "
>>
>>
>> another point: The Jan. 2008 W2 data at CADC have no RA-DEC listed. Is
>> it normal?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> yannick
>>
>>
>
Received on Tue Apr 08 2008 - 08:01:08 HST