Re: T0005

From: Yannick Mellier <mellier_at_iap.fr>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:06:48 +0200

      Dear JJ

    Sure, we can move i2->y , if you prefer ( "y" is the letter I used
during the production of i2 stacks... for similar reasons as you!).

     Cheers

yannick


JJ Kavelaars wrote:
> For the 'i2' filter to be accepted we will need to change a the filename
> configuration files and modify the ingestion script, both of which
> currently accept only a single character for the filter name.
>
> Likely Geoff and I can figure this out on Friday. (Geoff is home sick
> today and I'm off today)
>
> Switching to a difference single letter (I don't have an immediate good
> suggestion) is another possible solution.
>
> JJ
>
>
> On 21-Aug-08, at 10:40 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Dear John, dear JJ
>>
>> Thank you for the details. I looked at the rejected files and I
>> saw all *i2* files were rejected. The "i2" files are Deep stacks that
>> use the new
>> filter. Since the two i-filters have different transmission (i2 is bluer
>> and has a higher efficiency), we did stack together i and i2 images
>> (very bad for photo-z , for example). So, now the deep release have 6
>> filters, not 5. The Deep T0005 includes D-25 and D-85 data for
>> u,g,r,i,i2, and z, that is 40 different Deep , instead of 20 as in T0004.
>>
>> So, it is possible for you to include "i2" files?
>>
>> Sorry JJ, you already asked us the Auto_status and Auto_file tables,
>> but I forgot this point. I will se this with Fred.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> yannick
>>
>> John Ouellette wrote:
>>> Hi Yannick -- There are about 40 files that failed ingestion because
>>> they did not conform to the naming conventions for ingestion into the
>>> CADC archive. These files reside in /data/fcix3/raid/reject/name.
>>> Other than those, all of the files are now in the CADC archive: you
>>> should be able to retrieve them using our getData service or the
>>> CFHTLS web page.
>>> John Ouellette
>>> Yannick Mellier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear JJ
>>>>
>>>> The CFHTLS Deep and Wide have al been put on the CADC disks at
>>>> Terapix. Last data were put two days ago. Can you confirm you gor them
>>>> all? If so, I would be happy to have acces to them at CADC and double
>>>> check everything is there. If so, then when do you think T0005
>>>> could be
>>>> available to users? I will make explanatory pages available in
>>>> coordination with you.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> yannick
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thu Aug 21 2008 - 08:07:04 HST