OK, I think switching to 'y' will allow the files to be accepted
without modification at the archive end...
BTW: What did you call the filter in your Auto_* tables?
jj
On 21-Aug-08, at 11:06 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
>
>
> Dear JJ
>
> Sure, we can move i2->y , if you prefer ( "y" is the letter I used
> during the production of i2 stacks... for similar reasons as you!).
>
> Cheers
>
> yannick
>
>
> JJ Kavelaars wrote:
>> For the 'i2' filter to be accepted we will need to change a the
>> filename configuration files and modify the ingestion script, both
>> of which currently accept only a single character for the filter
>> name.
>> Likely Geoff and I can figure this out on Friday. (Geoff is home
>> sick today and I'm off today)
>> Switching to a difference single letter (I don't have an immediate
>> good suggestion) is another possible solution.
>> JJ
>> On 21-Aug-08, at 10:40 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear John, dear JJ
>>>
>>> Thank you for the details. I looked at the rejected files and
>>> I saw all *i2* files were rejected. The "i2" files are Deep
>>> stacks that use the new
>>> filter. Since the two i-filters have different transmission (i2 is
>>> bluer
>>> and has a higher efficiency), we did stack together i and i2
>>> images (very bad for photo-z , for example). So, now the deep
>>> release have 6 filters, not 5. The Deep T0005 includes D-25 and
>>> D-85 data for u,g,r,i,i2, and z, that is 40 different Deep ,
>>> instead of 20 as in T0004.
>>>
>>> So, it is possible for you to include "i2" files?
>>>
>>> Sorry JJ, you already asked us the Auto_status and Auto_file
>>> tables, but I forgot this point. I will se this with Fred.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> yannick
>>>
>>> John Ouellette wrote:
>>>> Hi Yannick -- There are about 40 files that failed ingestion
>>>> because they did not conform to the naming conventions for
>>>> ingestion into the CADC archive. These files reside in /data/
>>>> fcix3/raid/reject/name.
>>>> Other than those, all of the files are now in the CADC archive:
>>>> you should be able to retrieve them using our getData service or
>>>> the CFHTLS web page.
>>>> John Ouellette
>>>> Yannick Mellier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear JJ
>>>>>
>>>>> The CFHTLS Deep and Wide have al been put on the CADC disks at
>>>>> Terapix. Last data were put two days ago. Can you confirm you
>>>>> gor them
>>>>> all? If so, I would be happy to have acces to them at CADC and
>>>>> double
>>>>> check everything is there. If so, then when do you think T0005
>>>>> could be
>>>>> available to users? I will make explanatory pages available in
>>>>> coordination with you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> yannick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Received on Thu Aug 21 2008 - 08:30:55 HST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Jul 27 2017 - 17:52:27 HST