Re: T0005

From: Jean-Charles Cuillandre <jcc_at_cfht.hawaii.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:18:26 -1000

 Hi,

My only concern here is that y seems to refer to the Y band (1um),
but as long as everything is documented as usual, confusion will be avoided.

                                Jean-Charles.

> OK, I think switching to 'y' will allow the files to be accepted
> without modification at the archive end...
>
> BTW: What did you call the filter in your Auto_* tables?
>
> jj
>
> On 21-Aug-08, at 11:06 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Dear JJ
> >
> > Sure, we can move i2->y , if you prefer ( "y" is the letter I used
> > during the production of i2 stacks... for similar reasons as you!).
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > yannick
> >
> >
> > JJ Kavelaars wrote:
> >> For the 'i2' filter to be accepted we will need to change a the
> >> filename configuration files and modify the ingestion script, both
> >> of which currently accept only a single character for the filter
> >> name.
> >> Likely Geoff and I can figure this out on Friday. (Geoff is home
> >> sick today and I'm off today)
> >> Switching to a difference single letter (I don't have an immediate
> >> good suggestion) is another possible solution.
> >> JJ
> >> On 21-Aug-08, at 10:40 AM, Yannick Mellier wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear John, dear JJ
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the details. I looked at the rejected files and
> >>> I saw all *i2* files were rejected. The "i2" files are Deep
> >>> stacks that use the new
> >>> filter. Since the two i-filters have different transmission (i2 is
> >>> bluer
> >>> and has a higher efficiency), we did stack together i and i2
> >>> images (very bad for photo-z , for example). So, now the deep
> >>> release have 6 filters, not 5. The Deep T0005 includes D-25 and
> >>> D-85 data for u,g,r,i,i2, and z, that is 40 different Deep ,
> >>> instead of 20 as in T0004.
> >>>
> >>> So, it is possible for you to include "i2" files?
> >>>
> >>> Sorry JJ, you already asked us the Auto_status and Auto_file
> >>> tables, but I forgot this point. I will se this with Fred.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> yannick
> >>>
> >>> John Ouellette wrote:
> >>>> Hi Yannick -- There are about 40 files that failed ingestion
> >>>> because they did not conform to the naming conventions for
> >>>> ingestion into the CADC archive. These files reside in /data/
> >>>> fcix3/raid/reject/name.
> >>>> Other than those, all of the files are now in the CADC archive:
> >>>> you should be able to retrieve them using our getData service or
> >>>> the CFHTLS web page.
> >>>> John Ouellette
> >>>> Yannick Mellier wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear JJ
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The CFHTLS Deep and Wide have al been put on the CADC disks at
> >>>>> Terapix. Last data were put two days ago. Can you confirm you
> >>>>> gor them
> >>>>> all? If so, I would be happy to have acces to them at CADC and
> >>>>> double
> >>>>> check everything is there. If so, then when do you think T0005
> >>>>> could be
> >>>>> available to users? I will make explanatory pages available in
> >>>>> coordination with you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> yannick
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
Received on Thu Aug 21 2008 - 09:18:34 HST